Kenya’s Haiti Mission Stalls Amid Deepening Crisis
On Monday, Kenya's National Security Advisor Monica Juma addressed the UN Security Council (UNSC) regarding the Kenyan-led Multinational Security Support (MSS) mission to Haiti. Highlighting several issues, Juma revealed that over 200 trained Kenyan police officers remained in-country, unable to deploy to Haiti due to a shortage of equipment and logistical support. The latest UNSC session on Haiti made for grim viewing, as since the commencement of the MSS mission last year, one arguably doomed before it even began, the restive Caribbean nation has spiralled further into lawlessness. Others present further emphasised the scale of the challenges facing Haiti, with the UN Special Representative, María Isabel Salvador, warning that the country is approaching a "point of no return," while the Haitian ambassador to the UN said it was "slowly dying."
Since the assassination of President Jovenel Moïse in July 2021, Haiti has been upended and paralysed by paramilitary gangs with a penchant for extreme violence. Today, governance in large swathes of the troubled country has all but collapsed, with the vast majority of the capital, Port-au-Prince, dominated by heavily armed gangs. The situation has been particularly dire since February 2024, when Haitian PM Ariel Henry travelled to Nairobi in a bid to break the deadlock that had repeatedly delayed the Kenyan deployment. Henry would not return to Port-au-Prince– after he left the country, 4,000 inmates were broken out of prison, and the capital's security collapsed. Eventually, though, the deployment of Kenyan police officers as part of the MSS mission, now leading around 1,000 personnel from 6 countries, was intended to begin turning the tide and wresting power back into the hands of the Haitian transitional council. Those hopes quickly faded, with 2024 marking a fresh nadir for modern-day Haiti, with at least 5,600 people killed, according to UN figures, and dozens slain in several notorious massacres.
Amid significant delays and funding issues, the total officers under the command of Godfrey Otunge remains far below the 2,500 initially intended to pacify the country. The transitional council, too, remains beset by corruption and self-interest, with the prospect of elections in 2025 highly improbable and, in fact, only likely to further fuel the gang violence. Displacement numbers continue to climb as well, with nearly 703,000 people recorded as displaced in 2024 as the humanitarian situation deteriorated further. The UN is now appealing for USD 900 million to respond to the immense crisis, but few expect that such a sum will be raised.
The MSS mission, meanwhile, has struggled to make significant inroads in Haiti. On several occasions in neighbourhoods in Port-au-Prince, forces have pushed in and regained some territory last year, but these have proven to be short-term wins, and the gangs remain able to conduct their operations at whim. A massacre of over 200 people in early December on the orders of a gang leader who accused Vodou practitioners of responsibility for his son's illness emphasised the uphill battle the MSS mission and the Haitian forces are facing. These forces have struggled to retake territory and stabilise it primarily due to the personnel and equipment limitations. Kenyan officers have had to operate in a complex insurgent environment where French and Haitian Creole are predominantly spoken-- not English or Swahili. Washington has provided the MSS mission with a military base from which to operate, as well as equipment, including Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles. But many of these have been rendered ineffective, with the cumbersome vehicles struggling to navigate the capital's narrow streets and their non-bulletproof tyres being shot out. Their paramilitary adversaries, meanwhile, possess significant quantities of heavy weapons. In late March, the first Kenyan police officer, Benedict Kabiru, was killed in an ambush by suspected gang members.
These issues are not likely to ease anytime soon, with personnel numbers only creeping above 1,000 towards the end of 2024 and the MSS mission's future funding deeply uncertain. Initially, part of the rationale behind the Kenyan deployment was to engender Nairobi to the Biden administration, which had come to increasingly regard the country as a bulwark against the broader instability in the Horn of Africa. While the former US administration did not place much significance on its relationship with the continent, Kenyan President William Ruto was nevertheless afforded a State Visit in May 2024, where Kenya was elevated to the status of Major Non-NATO Ally, the first in sub-Saharan Africa. Bilateral trade deals and investments in Kenya's 'Silicon Savannah' were pledged, and, critically, the US promised to underwrite the majority of the costs of the Haiti mission.
Last year, with support from the Haitian transitional government, Kenya, and several Latin American countries, the Biden administration lobbied for the UNSC-approved MSS mission to be transformed into a formal UN peacekeeping operation, where it could access steadier funding, but Russia and China have vetoed such attempts. Today, the mission is reported to have only around USD 110 million in its UN Trust Fund coffers, far below the estimates of USD 600 million annual running costs, according to Nairobi. Most of this funding has come from the US and Canada, which previously led a security mission in Haiti, as well as Algeria, Spain, and Italy.
The question of funding is likely to become only more acute in the coming months, with a recently leaked State Department memo suggesting the US is preparing to entirely slash its budget for international peacekeeping missions. Earlier this year, the 90-day pause the Trump administration placed on all foreign aid also impacted the MSS mission. Further, Washington has provided mixed signals regarding its foreign policy towards Haiti, though Secretary of State Marco Rubio reaffirmed his government's commitment to the MSS mission in a recent phone call with President Ruto.
Nevertheless, with the Trump administration hell-bent on cutting nearly all foreign expenditures, it may well be that the MSS mission loses its primary donor. And with ballooning security and humanitarian demands on European donors and others, the likelihood of significant cash injections to support the requisite levels of personnel and equipment is extremely slim. It is also a matter of will regarding personnel. Benin had offered up to 2,000 soldiers but paused their deployment last year, arguing that the situation required a military---not policing-- solution. Similarly, other countries that promised to dispatch personnel are yet to follow through. Without greater logistical support and boots on the ground, whether police, soldiers or blue helmets, it is improbable that the current iteration of the mission will be able to carry out its mandate, which includes the protection of civilians.
Kenya's deployment to Haiti is far from the only multilateral deployment facing turmoil. Closer to home and one in which the Kenyan army is deployed, the African Union Support and Stabilisation Mission in Somalia (AUSSOM) similarly faces massive funding questions and personnel limitations. There are other similarities between Haiti and Somalia, two 'failed states' with a chequered history of foreign interventions and a lack of domestic political will amongst a divided national elite that has undermined ongoing security deployments. But looking ahead, with the Trump administration determined to pull back America from its role as the 'global policeman' and growing demands on other traditional donors, the future of large-scale multilateral peacekeeping operations is in doubt. It may be that the MSS mission struggles on in its diminished iteration due to US interests in Haiti and sustaining relations with Kenya, but it could be one of the last of its kind in the tail end of the liberal international order.
The Horn Edition Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
In the past months, a number of unsettling images and videos have emerged from the Russian frontlines in the Ukraine war. Within the horrors of the grinding "kill zone," where kamikaze drones strafe the sky for any signs of movement, yet another concerning dimension has emerged—the use of African recruits by Moscow in the conflict, often under false pretences. Particularly drawn from Kenya, many reportedly believed they were signing contracts to work as drivers or security guards, only to be shipped to the front lines upon arrival. Such activities are illustrative of several issues, including Russia's relationship with countries in the Horn of Africa, one shaped more by opportunistic realpolitik than genuine partnership.
Yesterday, 15 April, marked three years of brutal, grinding warfare between the Sudanese army and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). Wholly neglected by a fading international community, many grim landmarks have been passed; another genocide in Darfur, the weaponisation of rape and starvation, another famine, or the desecration of Khartoum, El Fasher, and other major cities. And with no ceasefire or settlement in sight, the war has continued to swell, drawing in each neighbouring African country as tussling Middle Eastern powers grapple for the upper hand-- leaving Sudan in tatters.
In September 2025, Feisal Mohammed Ali was arrested for possession and trading in two rhino horns worth USD 63,000. This was not the first time that this smuggler had seen the bars of a Kenyan prison cell. On 22 July 2016, Feisal - described as an “ivory smuggling kingpin” - received a 20-year prison sentence and fined USD 150,000 for dealing 314 pieces of ivory. Weighing over two tonnes, the ivory was estimated to have come from around 120 elephants. Hailed as a turning point in Kenya’s pioneering crackdown on Illegal Wildlife Trade (IWT), Feisal’s incarceration became proof of the country’s commitment to safeguarding its wildlife. This frail pillar came crashing down in August 2018 when Feisal was released following the acquittal of his sentence due to alleged use of tampered evidence by the prosecution.
Apathy pervades the Djiboutian population. A week tomorrow, on April 10, the country will head to the polls, with President Ismaïl Omar Guelleh seeking a 6th— essentially uncontested — term in office. With his coronation inevitable, his family's dynastic rule over this rentier city-state will be extended once more. But in a region wracked by armed conflict and geopolitical contestation, the ageing Guelleh's capacity to manage the familial, ethnic, and regional fractures within and without grows ever more complicated. And Djibouti's apparent stability is no product of institutional strength, but rather an increasingly fractious balance of external rents and coercive control-- underpinned by geopolitical relevance.
In early 1987, the commander of the Sudanese People's Liberation Army/Movement (SPLA/M), John Garang, is reported to have issued a radio order, instructing his field officers to gather children to be dispatched to Ethiopia for military training. Garang's command conveyed the rebels' institutionalisation of a well-established practice of child soldiering; a dynamic that has been reproduced by virtually every major armed actor in Sudan-- and later South Sudan-- since independence. Today, as war has continued to ravage and metastasise across Sudan, few communities and children have been left untouched by the ruinous violence.
The history of the contemporary Horn of Africa is littered with abandoned and abrogated peace agreements-- as well as a handful of successes. A petri dish (or Pandora's box) of issues related to sovereignty, inter- and intra-state conflict, and the nature of the state itself, the region has also been a laboratory for numerous forms of peacemaking and dealmaking. Yet in such a fractured regional order, 'peace' and 'conflict' should not be considered binaries, but rather as part of a sliding scale, where civilians may be targeted during the active fighting in South Sudan or suffer as part of a 'negative peace' in Tigray. Today, with predatory peace in South Sudan, Sudan, and perhaps now Tigray, having given way to renewed violence on a broad scale, what is the nature and future of peacemaking in the Horn of Africa?
Once on the US-designated terrorist sanctions list, it is unsurprisingly rather difficult to come off it. And with the US designating the 'Sudanese Muslim Brotherhood' as terrorists, elements of Khartoum's military government may now have the dubious honour of being on it twice. First time out in 1993, Khartoum was deemed a US State Sponsor of Terror in the wake of a raft of jihadist plots linked to the Islamist authorities in Sudan. Nearly three decades later, and only after Sudan's partial ascension to the Abraham Accords, the title and punishing sanctions were lifted for the civilian-military transitional government. Today, though the warring Sudan is no longer home to an Osama bin Laden or Carlos the Jackal, a US labelling of 'terrorist' has returned to Khartoum.
At the end of February, Ethiopian PM Abiy Ahmed departed on a rather unusual visit to Baku, Azerbaijan. Slated as a meeting between two emerging powers, a focus on trade and investment frameworks was particularly emphasised by Foreign Minister Gedion Timotheos. More importantly, of course, was the signing of a comprehensive defence agreement by the two countries on 27 February. Spanning drone technology, armoured vehicles, artillery shell production, and air defence, the new agreement builds upon a framework from November 2025, which also included reference to refurbishing T-72 tanks, electronic warfare, and military-industrial manufacturing. Though war has not yet returned to Tigray as many feared, Abiy's vision of a militarised domestic —and regional —posture no doubt requires more hardware.
Earlier this month, dozens of heads of state and government gathered in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, for the 39th Ordinary Session of the Assembly of the African Union (AU). The theme of this summit prioritised water security and sanitation, discussing various ways to address these issues amid the unrelenting climate crisis. A worthy subject, no doubt, but the geopolitical backdrop of the summit remains unremittingly grim. Taking place in Addis —amid war looking ever more likely in Tigray —the gathering of leaders again served to uncomfortably emphasise the decline of the AU.