The Man and The Chokepoint: Djibouti’s Succession Gamble
Despite rumours of declining health, Djibouti’s President Ismaïl Omar Guelleh’s (IOG) is maneuvering to extend his grip on power amid growing tensions over succession. The 77 year-old leader, who took power in 1999 as his uncle’s hand-picked successor, has pushed through constitutional changes that allow him to run again in 2026, with the age limit having been scrapped on 2 November – moves that have further ignited both public discontent and simmering rivalries between Djibouti’s Afar and Issa communities. Guelleh, has maintained a relatively low public profile in the past year. In late September 2024, social media reports claimed he had been hospitalised and flown to Paris due to critical illness, with some even suggesting internet outages in Djibouti aimed at suppressing news of his condition. His Finance Minister, Ilyas Moussa Dawaleh, flatly disputed reports that Guelleh was critically ill, confirming only that the president had an issue with his right knee. But these denials, along with his refusal to establish a clear succession plan, have only intensified speculation about Djibouti’s political future. As IOG clings to power, the prospect of a succession crisis looms large, threatening instability in the nation.
Personal rule and family connections have shaped Djibouti’s politics for decades. After gaining independence from France in 1977, President Hassan Gouled Aptidon, an Issa Somali elder, governed for twenty years. In 1999, he stepped down and his nephew, Ismaïl Omar Guelleh, took over, winning four more elections, often without real opposition. In 2010, Guelleh changed the constitution to remove the two term limit, allowing him to seek a third term in 2011 and ultimately remain in power through five consecutive terms.
Under Guelleh’s iron grip, Djibouti has remained stable, despite being one of Africa’s poorest states. Virtually no domestic industry or agriculture sustains the economy. Instead, the regime lives off income from foreign militaries and transit fees. Geographically, Djibouti is tiny, with a population of about 1 million, yet it controls the Bab-el-Mandeb chokepoint at the mouth of the Red Sea, which is a key location on global trade routes. It is for that reason that several countries maintain military bases on Djiboutian soil, including the US Camp Lemonnier, and France’s Djibouti garrison, later joined by China’s first overseas base in 2017, as well as facilities for Japan, Italy, and others. Ethiopia reportedly pays around USD 2 billion a year in port fees to Djibouti, while foreign navies contribute over USD 300 million for access to its harbors. Moreover, a predicted USD 38 million Chinese-backed deal envisions producing 6 million tonnes of salt annually, from the desolate shores of Lake Assal, one of the saltiest bodies of water on Earth. Yet in 2023, the country’s salt exports totaled less than USD 200’000 – a stark reminder of how thin Djibouti’s domestic economic base remains.
Behind closed doors, a bitter contest for power is already underway among the ruling family and clan elite. Guelleh’s inner circle is built on two tiers: the family sphere and his Issa clan. Within the family, Guelleh’s wife, Kadra Mahamoud Haid, has been described as the real centre of power. In particular, Kadra has been pushing for her elder son from a previous marriage, Naguib Abdallah Kamil, to play a leading political role. Naguid, being Afar, is not the choice of the powerful Issa clan to which Guelleh belongs. With the clan favouring an Issa successor to maintain traditional dominance, Alexis Mohammed Guelon has reportedly been put forward to scuttle Naguib’s bid. In September 2025, Gueldon, an important aide to Guelleh, resigned, bringing the long-simmering rift within the ruling elite into the open. According to reports, many members of Guelleh’s own clan now resent the first lady’s influence on the politics of the country. Clan elders have felt that Kadra has tried to manipulate political decision-making around her children and has been exploiting Guelleh’s declining health to advance their standing. It was rumoured that the current AU chairman and former foreign minister, Mohamoud Ali Youssouf, who is also Afar, was eased out primarily to clear the path for Naguib and narrow the field of potential contenders. There has even been talk of factional discontent within the military and security organs, with some officers seen as loyal to Guelleh personally and others quietly supportive of alternative successors. It was as early as 2022 that these dynamics came to light when Djibouti’s Chiefs of Army and Police were briefly arrested in a rumoured plot of a coup.
In late October, succession plans shifted sharply following a special Parliament session to discuss amending the constitution. Under Article 91, an amendment requires signatures from one-third of MPs to move to the voting stage and a two-thirds majority to pass, with the Speaker having the option to bypass a referendum. On 2 November, lawmakers unanimously approved the change to the constitution and removed the bar on running for president past the age of 75. This has cleared the way for Gulleh - who will be 78 at the time of the 2026 elections - to run for his sixth term, wholly complicating the ethnic dynamics of the succession struggle. The Issa Somalis make up roughly two thirds of the population at 60%, with Afar accounting for most of the rest. During Gouled’s rule in the 1980s to 1990s, a disenfranchised Afar minority rose in rebellion under the Front for the Restoration of Unity and Democracy (FRUD), which accused the Issa-led regime of systematic exclusion by shutting Afars out of government jobs and security forces. The 1991-1994 civil war ended with a shaky peace deal, but grievances persisted with sporadic Afar protests and clashes in the 2000s and then again in the 2011 elections. And though these issues are not silenced, Guelleh’s strongman state has kept the peace by balancing Issa and Afar interplays .
Earlier this year, in late January, Djibouti conducted a drone strike in a rural area about six kilometres away from the Ethiopian border, which, according to reports, targeted the Afar militant group Armed Front for the Restoration of Unity and Democracy (FRUDA). Djibouti’s military spokesman claimed eight “terrorists” were killed and labelled the attack as being within Djibouti’s sovereign territory, but local Afar residents on the Ethiopian side disputed the narrative, reporting civilian casualties. The Djiboutian League for Human Rights even denounced the raid as a ‘war crime’ against Afar communities. And though Addis did not publicly retaliate, the incident stoked anger among Afars on both sides of the border.
Djibouti’s future is important to countries far beyond its borders. China has invested heavily in Djibouti’s ports and railways, especially the Doraleh Container Terminal, which is now mostly run by Chinese companies. The United States and its allies have also put significant resources into the country. If there is a contested leadership change, Djibouti could quickly become a stage for international competition. In the past, foreign powers have disagreed over Djibouti, such as when France and the US argued about using the port for a French military contractor. Now, China’s growing role is causing new concerns.
Looking at broader Horn dynamics, Ethiopia is one of Djibouti’s key partners, but it too is beginning to look elsewhere. Addis Ababa is developing alternative routes to the sea via Somaliland. Ethiopia’s leaders have loudly encouraged port deals that bypass Djibouti, planning to ship Ethiopian goods through Berbera with potential Gulf investment, thus draining Djibouti of its financial lifeblood. And though Somaliland itself can be considered a wildcard, the unrecognised republic wants international backing and could offer incentives to attract Djibouti’s neighbours. If Somaliland expands ties with Ethiopia and the UAE, Djibouti could lose both trade and prestige in the Horn of Africa.
The Horn Edition Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
In the past months, a number of unsettling images and videos have emerged from the Russian frontlines in the Ukraine war. Within the horrors of the grinding "kill zone," where kamikaze drones strafe the sky for any signs of movement, yet another concerning dimension has emerged—the use of African recruits by Moscow in the conflict, often under false pretences. Particularly drawn from Kenya, many reportedly believed they were signing contracts to work as drivers or security guards, only to be shipped to the front lines upon arrival. Such activities are illustrative of several issues, including Russia's relationship with countries in the Horn of Africa, one shaped more by opportunistic realpolitik than genuine partnership.
Yesterday, 15 April, marked three years of brutal, grinding warfare between the Sudanese army and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). Wholly neglected by a fading international community, many grim landmarks have been passed; another genocide in Darfur, the weaponisation of rape and starvation, another famine, or the desecration of Khartoum, El Fasher, and other major cities. And with no ceasefire or settlement in sight, the war has continued to swell, drawing in each neighbouring African country as tussling Middle Eastern powers grapple for the upper hand-- leaving Sudan in tatters.
In September 2025, Feisal Mohammed Ali was arrested for possession and trading in two rhino horns worth USD 63,000. This was not the first time that this smuggler had seen the bars of a Kenyan prison cell. On 22 July 2016, Feisal - described as an “ivory smuggling kingpin” - received a 20-year prison sentence and fined USD 150,000 for dealing 314 pieces of ivory. Weighing over two tonnes, the ivory was estimated to have come from around 120 elephants. Hailed as a turning point in Kenya’s pioneering crackdown on Illegal Wildlife Trade (IWT), Feisal’s incarceration became proof of the country’s commitment to safeguarding its wildlife. This frail pillar came crashing down in August 2018 when Feisal was released following the acquittal of his sentence due to alleged use of tampered evidence by the prosecution.
Apathy pervades the Djiboutian population. A week tomorrow, on April 10, the country will head to the polls, with President Ismaïl Omar Guelleh seeking a 6th— essentially uncontested — term in office. With his coronation inevitable, his family's dynastic rule over this rentier city-state will be extended once more. But in a region wracked by armed conflict and geopolitical contestation, the ageing Guelleh's capacity to manage the familial, ethnic, and regional fractures within and without grows ever more complicated. And Djibouti's apparent stability is no product of institutional strength, but rather an increasingly fractious balance of external rents and coercive control-- underpinned by geopolitical relevance.
In early 1987, the commander of the Sudanese People's Liberation Army/Movement (SPLA/M), John Garang, is reported to have issued a radio order, instructing his field officers to gather children to be dispatched to Ethiopia for military training. Garang's command conveyed the rebels' institutionalisation of a well-established practice of child soldiering; a dynamic that has been reproduced by virtually every major armed actor in Sudan-- and later South Sudan-- since independence. Today, as war has continued to ravage and metastasise across Sudan, few communities and children have been left untouched by the ruinous violence.
The history of the contemporary Horn of Africa is littered with abandoned and abrogated peace agreements-- as well as a handful of successes. A petri dish (or Pandora's box) of issues related to sovereignty, inter- and intra-state conflict, and the nature of the state itself, the region has also been a laboratory for numerous forms of peacemaking and dealmaking. Yet in such a fractured regional order, 'peace' and 'conflict' should not be considered binaries, but rather as part of a sliding scale, where civilians may be targeted during the active fighting in South Sudan or suffer as part of a 'negative peace' in Tigray. Today, with predatory peace in South Sudan, Sudan, and perhaps now Tigray, having given way to renewed violence on a broad scale, what is the nature and future of peacemaking in the Horn of Africa?
Once on the US-designated terrorist sanctions list, it is unsurprisingly rather difficult to come off it. And with the US designating the 'Sudanese Muslim Brotherhood' as terrorists, elements of Khartoum's military government may now have the dubious honour of being on it twice. First time out in 1993, Khartoum was deemed a US State Sponsor of Terror in the wake of a raft of jihadist plots linked to the Islamist authorities in Sudan. Nearly three decades later, and only after Sudan's partial ascension to the Abraham Accords, the title and punishing sanctions were lifted for the civilian-military transitional government. Today, though the warring Sudan is no longer home to an Osama bin Laden or Carlos the Jackal, a US labelling of 'terrorist' has returned to Khartoum.
At the end of February, Ethiopian PM Abiy Ahmed departed on a rather unusual visit to Baku, Azerbaijan. Slated as a meeting between two emerging powers, a focus on trade and investment frameworks was particularly emphasised by Foreign Minister Gedion Timotheos. More importantly, of course, was the signing of a comprehensive defence agreement by the two countries on 27 February. Spanning drone technology, armoured vehicles, artillery shell production, and air defence, the new agreement builds upon a framework from November 2025, which also included reference to refurbishing T-72 tanks, electronic warfare, and military-industrial manufacturing. Though war has not yet returned to Tigray as many feared, Abiy's vision of a militarised domestic —and regional —posture no doubt requires more hardware.
Earlier this month, dozens of heads of state and government gathered in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, for the 39th Ordinary Session of the Assembly of the African Union (AU). The theme of this summit prioritised water security and sanitation, discussing various ways to address these issues amid the unrelenting climate crisis. A worthy subject, no doubt, but the geopolitical backdrop of the summit remains unremittingly grim. Taking place in Addis —amid war looking ever more likely in Tigray —the gathering of leaders again served to uncomfortably emphasise the decline of the AU.