The Somalia-Kenya maritime dispute took center stage at The Hague, where a formal hearing was slated to determine control over offshore territory. Somalia sent its deputy prime minister and officials, signaling a serious commitment to defending national interests, while Kenya unexpectedly withdrew at the last minute, delaying proceedings for the fourth time. The dispute has been framed by Somalia’s political elite as a matter of national pride, providing President Mohamed Abdullahi Farmaajo a strategic distraction from domestic political crises. The Somali government’s maximalist stance showcases the country’s determination, though the International Court of Justice’s verdict is non-binding and may not compel Kenya to comply. Farmaajo’s supporters see the proceedings as a golden opportunity to bolster the president’s popularity and consolidate political power at a time when his approval ratings are waning. Analysts note that Kenya has strengthened its navy and coast guard to protect offshore oil facilities, reflecting the high stakes involved. While the court process continues, the situation underscores the complex interplay between regional diplomacy, national pride, and domestic political maneuvering in Somalia. Encouraging Somalia and Kenya to seek amicable settlement remains crucial to avoid potential conflict over these finite maritime resources.