EU High Representative Josep Borrell sparked global debate with his “garden vs. jungle” metaphor, portraying Europe as a cultivated “garden” and much of the rest of the world – implicitly the Global South – as a “jungle” threatening to “invade.” While Borrell later clarified that he was referring to lawless global politics rather than geography or race, the comments drew criticism for colonial undertones. Borrell highlighted Somalia as an example of the “perfect storm” facing fragile states: terrorism, maritime insecurity, climate change, rising commodity prices, and a worsening humanitarian crisis. He praised EU missions in Somalia for advancing European values and protecting Europe’s security, stressing that “security starts in Mogadishu.” Yet, he notably avoided linking Somalia’s instability to migration – even though in past speeches he has acknowledged Europe’s pull for migrants seeking safety or opportunity. Critics also noted Europe’s historic role in exploiting the Global South, questioning whether Borrell’s vision of “engagement” is enough to address deep inequalities and root causes of displacement. With millions across East Africa facing famine and displacement, the question remains: will Europe view them as fellow “gardeners” or as part of the “jungle” it fears?